Jun 152010

It is not easy being Alvin Greene, the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate from South Carolina. There are numerous questions, controversies, and even conspiracy theories surrounding his unlikely win in the primary last week. The media and politicians from both sides have questioned everything from his moral character to his mental capacity to run a campaign. Even with his win in the primary, he seems like the loser in this political game.

Greene is unemployed. He was kicked out of the military after 13 years last August because “things just weren’t working”. He lives in his father’s home, with no cell phone and no computer. None of this shouts political ambition.

Greene is facing felony obscenity charges. He was caught on video showing allegedly obscene photos from a website to a female victim at the University of South Carolina. These charges were filed before he through his hat into the political arena. He is being represented by a public defender because he claimed to be unable to afford his own attorney.

Greene funded his “campaign” himself. According to reports he originally tried to pay the $10,400 needed to get his name on the ballot with a personal check. He returned a few hours later with a check from his campaign account. Questions have been raised on where he got the money from, but he is adamant that it was his own money.

Greene is not the most eloquent speaker. His way of speaking has lead both interviewers and members of his own party to question his mental health. One democratic representative who spoke with Greene said that if he were his client he would ask for a mental evaluation. Something just seems off about his reactions to this entire situation.

Greene has almost no campaign support. No campaign staff. No office. No advertisements of any kind. He does not even have a website. Of course he would need to buy a computer to look at it anyway.

Greene has no party support. Leadership of the Democratic party have asked him to step down. They are not supporting him at all, but some are going so far as accusing him of being a Republican plant. Even if he was a plant that still does not explain how he got the votes. The scale of the conspiracy required to get him on the ballot and then get him the votes needed to win is unrealistically epic in scope.

The late Andy Warhol once said that in the future everyone would be famous for 15 minutes. Mr. Greene your clock is running. I hope you survive the experience. It is not going to get any easier to be you any time soon.

While there are people out there trying to come up with solutions to the BP oil spill, there is little indication that there is much headway being made. The spill keeps spreading, more oil is being dumped in the Gulf, and BP Corporate seems to be keeping everyone with any desire to help at arm’s length. Of course, there’s also the British citizens claiming that Americans aren’t very pleased with them over all of this, but honestly, there doesn’t seem to be much proof of that.

Most are assuming at this point that Obama is going to be pinning all his hopes on the concept of closing the barn door after the horses have all left, by taking over the the claims process, theoretically ensuring that the people affected are compensated for their losses. And that may very well be his undoing, particularly when the Brits are questioning his credibility. This shouldn’t be unexpected, since Obama’s waited close to 60 days to bother talking directly with BP officials.

And there lies the biggest problem – the lack of communication amongst the stakeholders involved. That failure is snowballing at nearly the same rate that the Gulf is filling with oil. Instead of worrying primarily about making BP pay for the damages, it would be better if Obama was focusing more on solutions. Taking over full control of clean-up would be a nice start. Putting out a standing call for help to all corporations and individuals worldwide would be an even better move. Yes, it would be chaotic to say the least. Of course, a few phone calls to the environmental organizations out there to recruit people to manage phone calls, emails, and letters would be a smart first step. The point is that there should be absolutely no headlines about anyone offering help and being flat out refused. Whether it’s a group of people like Shoq Value’s #corral project, or Hollywood personalities like Kevin Costner, no source of ideas should be ignored.

Big corporations in the U.S. have been demonized lately, so it isn’t hard to understand why it would be difficult to come out suggesting something like radical tax breaks for companies that would do anything significant to help with the oil spill. Each minute that this situation isn’t addressed meaningfully is inches and feet worth of spoiled coastline. Eventually someone will come up with the bright idea to come up with an equation to figure out at least a reasonable estimate of the losses. The fact that Alaska still has not recovered completely from the Exxon Valdez spill should be plastered in the back of the mind of every person involved in the clean up now.

Talk this evening will undoubtedly limited to reassuring the public that the problem is of the highest priority in the White House, and that BP will be held financially accountable for the damages. We’ll have to watch in the coming months to see what effect that has on our relations with Britain. But it’s doubtful that there will be any mention of opening the floodgates, and taking suggestions from the public at large for solutions – doubtful there will be talk about incentives to encourage corporate America to lend a hand in the clean up. And those incentives are needed, because unless the clean up is directly related to the current business goals of any given corporation, there is no chance they’ll consider lifting a finger. Even if their business is management of disasters of this kind, they will do nothing unless there is some promise of benefit on their end, or if they are directly hired to help. BP is not showing any signs that they are interested in enlisting help, so that is a moot point. It is tempting to leave them to clean up their own mess, but since they are proving to be grossly ill-equipped to manage it, we need to take the reins. Hopefully Obama won’t be talking just about money from BP. It’s a small hope, and there’s little chance that the situation is going to change.

  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

UC Irvine has done something that many probably would never consider as an option for any campus in the UC system – it is recommending the suspension of a student organization on the grounds of hate speech. A Muslim student organization found it necessary to lie to campus officials about its involvement in an organized protest against Israel through the disruption of a speech given by an Israeli official. Yes, I am intentionally generalizing the details on this for a very good reason.

Consider this situation any way you like, inserting whatever group you like – switch Muslim and Israeli, if you like. Or maybe insert Christian and Atheist, or vice versa. Perhaps even Democrat and Republican. Then consider how outraged you happen to be with each situation.

The bottom line is that these students intentionally orchestrated an activity with the specific purpose of disrupting a school activity. The fact that it involved two specific racial groups that happen to be at war with each other exacerbated the situation, and raised the situation to not only a simple offense against school policies, but also made it an offense against laws forbidding hate crimes. They got lucky that they didn’t end up facing harassment and disturbing the peace charges with any applicable counts under hate crime statutes.

They should also consider themselves lucky that they are not at a school with much more stringent policies when it comes to making a mockery of the institution. That is precisely what they did. UC Irvine has suffered at least a little from this entire situation – it does nothing for their reputation with Israel, and undoubtedly other governmental entities.

The really disturbing situation is that student leaders have come out in defense of this group of students. Apparently the reputation of their institution is meaningless to them. If it was a matter of these students assembling outside the hall where this speech was given, carrying protest signs, it would be absolutely justifiable to defend their right to do so, assuming that they did so peacefully, without accosting anyone, or doing damage to any property. But interrupting a speaker on campus with hate-filled speech is utterly inappropriate, and indefensible.

  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark
© 2010 Everything in Its Own Time Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009-2010 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD