President Obama’s Oval Office Address to the nation on Tuesday evening was a lot of talk about the problem, but no real solution. For the first two thirds of the speech, when he talked about the clean up, he seemed distant and may have contradicted himself. When he talked about clean energy being the future it seemed like it was the same old big dreams song I had heard before. Obama, like former President Jimmy Carter, is big on dreams and long term goals, but weak on immediate solutions.

Calling together panels of experts to solve the problem of the spill is all well and good, but 8 weeks later still not having a solution is unacceptable. The American people expect results, not committee meetings to further discuss possible strategies for reducing the leak. If another 8 weeks go by without that leak being shut down, then Obama’s numbers may never recover.

Saying BP will pay is nice, but making them pay long term is a much more complicated matter. An escrow account is a good start, but is 20 billion enough? Do we even have a clue yet of the final cost? What happens when BP decides enough is enough?

Using this disaster to push for alternative energy would be nice, but he talked about wind energy and other alternatives none of which really deal with what we use oil for. Oil is mainly for cars, Mr. President. What are we going to run them on? Not the hybrids or the smart cars, but all the cars that belong to people too broke from the recession to afford the new vehicles even if they were readily available.

A Gulf Coast Restoration Plan is nice, but again this is a long term goal not a short term solution. The reaction coming from those who make their living from the Gulf is that we do not need plans, but solutions. Counting days no longer matter when the root of the problem has still not been solved.

Carter faced a different oil crisis, but his lack of leadership and solutions in that time is being mirrored in this time by the current administration. We need solutions, not dreams. We need prompt results, not long term planning. We need leadership that we can get behind now, not hope that change will come some time. We were promised change, but not from bad to worse.

“Dear Lord, This year you took my favorite actor, Patrick Swayzie. You took my favorite actress, Farrah Fawcett. You took my favorite singer, Michael Jackson. I just wanted to let you know, my favorite president is Barack Obama. Amen”

This “prayer”, currently circulating on Facebook, is a variation on the one e-mailed by New Jersey teacher’s union representative Joseph Coppola about that state’s governor, Chris Christie ,during a conflict over proposed education cutbacks. In his apology Coppola stated, “While it was intended as a joke I recognize that it was in poor taste, bad taste and was definitely an error of poor judgment and I sincerely apologize to the governor.” That apology was issued after the message was sent to 17,000 union members. Currently on Facebook 1,183,063 people have read this message and clicked that they like this statement and that number is growing.

For those unfamiliar with Facebook, most posts, statements, or links come with a Like button that you can click to show approval, support, or general agreement. The fact that well over a million people have shown support for this statement is frightening. Defenders of this statement may try and excuse it as a joke, but the fact that it is worded as a prayer makes it no laughing matter.

Prayer is sacred to a number of religions. Joking about prayer should be troubling to a number of people. The recent controversy over South Park and Mohammad illustrates the problems that can arise when humor and religion are at odds. This “prayer” would be at odds with several religions, but since the “prayer” begins with “Dear Lord,” it brings to mind Christianity first and foremost.

Christians willing to support a prayer calling on God to “take” the president is an act of hypocrisy. Christianity does not need any more attention for hypocrisy. Christians that are Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty do that well enough already. No matter who the statement is about, and no matter how the individual may feel about their politics, this “prayer” stands at odds with Christian teachings and beliefs. Invoking the Lord in this “joke” qualifies as taking the Lord’s name in vain. One commandment broken. Another commandment says something about not killing. Asking the almighty to do it for you? Probably sacrilege at best.

What is the truth behind the sentiment of this message? Would those who supported this statement be upset at the death of Barack Obama, or thankful for answered prayers? To publicly support a “prayer” calling upon the almighty to take the president’s life borders on sedition. Threats against the life of any president, no matter how veiled, are no joking matter.

© 2012 Jousting Windmills Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer