We have all heard by now that Osama Bin Laden was hiding in plain sight in Abbottabad, Pakistan, but I do not think the media coverage has adequately introduced us to the neighborhood Mr. Bin Laden called home for possibly the last 6 years. Sure his proximity to the Pakistani military academy has been noted as has his proximity to the town’s golf course, but playing around with Google Maps and Earth has revealed a neighborhood not much different from our own.

Al-Baik Fried Chicken

Al-Baik Fried Chicken (albaik.com)


There is the local market where Bin Laden’s entourage would shop for their necessities. He may have declared a holy war against America, but when it came to the Cola War’s it seems he and his posse remained neutral favoring equally Coke and Pepsi.

There is an AMC Cinema Hall just a short mile from his compound. One wonders if he ever snuck out to the movies. Perhaps to see “Fahrenheit 9/11″ when he needed a good laugh. Pity anyone sitting behind him and trying to see the screen. I have to drive 15 minutes to my nearest theater and a half an hour for the first really decent one.

There are many nearby hotels, including the Hotel City Centre. I listed this one because it was the only one I could find with pictures. It has a variety of rooms, a conference room, and a banquet area. It also has a mall on the first floor. Heck the town I live in does not even have a hotel. Our closest thing to a hotel is the Holiday Inn the next town over and their only shopping provided is the Adult Bookstore adjacent to their parking lot.

There look to be many stores located up and down the nearby highway but not all were listed with Google. I managed to find listings for a coffee shop called Coffity, Al-Baik Fried Chicken, and Milano Pizza among others. There are computer firms and schools all over the town. There are parks and sporting fields. No baseball or football, but Soccer and what looks like a very nice Cricket field.

Far from a cave in the middle of nowhere, Mister Bin Laden spent his last years living in a neighborhood, a typical suburban neighborhood. A neighborhood unaware of just who their most famous neighbor was. Unaware that was, until the helicopters showed up to clean up their neighborhood.

My Mother has been a substitute teacher in the Belle Vernon Area School District of Western Pennsylvania for the past 37 years. She is 74 years old and teaching is not a job to her, it is part of who she is. As she put it after God, and her family, the most important thing to her is teaching. For this dedication she deserves respect.

Desk - Corey Leopold (CC)

Frontier Desk - Corey Leopold (CC)

Well last Friday afternoon, she was shown nothing but disrespect. Not disrespect from the third graders  she had been teaching daily since about mid year, but from the administration. About 15 minutes before she was supposed to leave for the day she received a call, not from the principal who was still in the building, but from the woman who calls the substitutes for the district. She was told that this would be her last day and that she had 15 minutes to gather her things and leave. No chance to say goodbye to her students, just get her things and go.

It seems that the problem arose because one parent questioned her qualifications to teach. Seems my Mother did not meet some Act 48 requirements to be able to teach more than 90 days for years. I am told this law has been on the books since 2000 and she was never been questioned about it before. Mom had had no contact from this parent and no problems with their child.

I realize that rules are rules, and the law is the law, but I also know my Mother deserved more respect from the Belle Vernon Area administration than she was shown. Substitute teaching is a tough job. No benefits, no retirement, and you only get paid a fraction of what a regular teacher would be paid for the same time. My Mother very rarely refused a call to substitute and she would go above and beyond to do a good job for the students. She should have had someone look her in the face about the situation and been given a chance to make a smoother exit transition both for her and the students.

My Mother was not just a temp at some job, she was a teacher substituting for another teacher. If teaching is still to be considered a noble profession then my Mother deserved treated much, much more nobly. The funny thing is they may have taken away her ability to substitute, but they cannot take away her ability to teach. That she will still do for the dozen kids she tutors one on one after school 4 nights a week.  She only charges ten dollars an hour and her rates have never gone up in over twenty two years of doing it. She tutors because it  is teaching, and a teacher is what and who she is.

Ashley Kauffman, 19 year old college student, was told she was “too big, too heavy” to be in the front row of the audience for American Idol. A female staffer kept her from sitting in the front row, and a male staffer kept her from sitting behind her friends and sent her to the back.

LaKisha Jones - Jyle Dupuis (CC)

LaKisha Jones - Jyle Dupuis (CC)


There was a time when another group was sent to the back and that was wrong, but now the new discrimination is all right with Fox. Not the first time Fox and American Idol have been at the center of a weight discrimination controversy. Wonder when they will learn their lesson?

Kauffman weighs 150 pounds, according to the CDC the average American woman weighs about 165 pounds. Anyone can do the math on that one. The average American woman is too big for the front row of American Idol. That is ridiculous. We are not talking about to be a model, to be a star, but only to sit in the front row of an audience. If that is not blatant discrimination then what is?

Plus size have actresses have made strides this season. Melissa McCarthy is half of a hit on Mike & Molly for CBS. Fox itself has brought Ashley Fink into the forefront of Glee as the the confident Lauren Zizes. Guess that stars are one thing but audiences members are a different story.

The discrimination against the heavy has reached the point where it is discrimination against the average. As a heavy American, and I can not believe I just used that term, I can say that enough is enough. When the average American is too heavy for a seat in the front row, then maybe American Idol needs a reality check. Otherwise rename it Elitist Idol, because their policies no longer represent America.

Louis J. Marinelli once loudly and vehemently opposed gays and lesbians from having the right to marry. He opposed it so strongly that he, according to his own blog, organized the 2010 Summer for Marriage Tour for the National Organization for Marriage. He organized rallies and started Facebook groups. Then something happened, Marinelli had a change of heart.

Wedding Ring - Eivind Barstad Waaler (CC)

Wedding Ring - Eivind Barstad Waaler (CC)

He realized over time that he supported civil marriage equality. He realized that gays and lesbians were not out to destroy American culture, they were just real people who wanted the same rights to participate in it as the rest of us. I commend him for having the courage to stand up to those he once supported, and to apologize to those he once attacked. I also commend him for commenting on the difference between civil marriage and holy matrimony.

He summed it up clearly and eloquently by saying “Once you understand the great difference between civil marriage and holy marriage, there is not one valid reason to forbid the former from same-sex couples, and all that is left to protect is the latter.”

Some may challenge Marinelli’s right to continue to call himself a conservative, but I consider myself a conservative and I agree with him. Being conservative is not a matter of religion, and those that see that it is have hijacked the term for their own use. Being conservative is also not a matter of discrimination, bigotry, or denying individuals their right to equality under law.

Arguments against civil marriage equality are impossible to make without religion entering the argument. If religion is the only basis for the argument, then a little thing called the First Amendment comes into play. Our government has no right to deny civil equality of any kind based only on religious arguments. People are guarantee the freedom of religion, but they are also guaranteed freedom from religion.

Marinelli had a change of heart, but it will take a lot more hearts to change before there is any chance of national civil marriage equality, especially if you take into account recent polls in Mississippi about GOP voters’ views on interracial marriage, marriage equality still has a long way to go.

“Dear Lord, This year you took my favorite actor, Patrick Swayzie. You took my favorite actress, Farrah Fawcett. You took my favorite singer, Michael Jackson. I just wanted to let you know, my favorite president is Barack Obama. Amen”

This “prayer”, currently circulating on Facebook, is a variation on the one e-mailed by New Jersey teacher’s union representative Joseph Coppola about that state’s governor, Chris Christie ,during a conflict over proposed education cutbacks. In his apology Coppola stated, “While it was intended as a joke I recognize that it was in poor taste, bad taste and was definitely an error of poor judgment and I sincerely apologize to the governor.” That apology was issued after the message was sent to 17,000 union members. Currently on Facebook 1,183,063 people have read this message and clicked that they like this statement and that number is growing.

For those unfamiliar with Facebook, most posts, statements, or links come with a Like button that you can click to show approval, support, or general agreement. The fact that well over a million people have shown support for this statement is frightening. Defenders of this statement may try and excuse it as a joke, but the fact that it is worded as a prayer makes it no laughing matter.

Prayer is sacred to a number of religions. Joking about prayer should be troubling to a number of people. The recent controversy over South Park and Mohammad illustrates the problems that can arise when humor and religion are at odds. This “prayer” would be at odds with several religions, but since the “prayer” begins with “Dear Lord,” it brings to mind Christianity first and foremost.

Christians willing to support a prayer calling on God to “take” the president is an act of hypocrisy. Christianity does not need any more attention for hypocrisy. Christians that are Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty do that well enough already. No matter who the statement is about, and no matter how the individual may feel about their politics, this “prayer” stands at odds with Christian teachings and beliefs. Invoking the Lord in this “joke” qualifies as taking the Lord’s name in vain. One commandment broken. Another commandment says something about not killing. Asking the almighty to do it for you? Probably sacrilege at best.

What is the truth behind the sentiment of this message? Would those who supported this statement be upset at the death of Barack Obama, or thankful for answered prayers? To publicly support a “prayer” calling upon the almighty to take the president’s life borders on sedition. Threats against the life of any president, no matter how veiled, are no joking matter.

Lane Bryant wanted to put a twenty five second ad for their new Cacique Intimates on American Idol.  Fox refused to air the ad as-is, asking for modifications, and also refused to play the ad until after 9pm.  A Fox spokesperson said, “8p is the Family Hour”.   The initial refusal to air the ad, and the statement used to justify that decision both raise questions.

Is the fact that the ad features a plus sized woman a case of discrimination against the overweight?  The lingerie featured is no more revealing than a swim suit.  The fact that the lingerie ad features a plus sized model with a fuller figure than the thin super models of Victoria’s Secret ads has many claiming discrimination.  The model is more typical of the average American woman and yet somehow not appropriate for the 8pm hour.  This just perpetuates the illusions that lead to negative body image and eating disorders.

Fox’s prime time programming on Sunday evening featured a female model in just as revealing attire during  an ad for razors for men.  The model in the ad, which aired several times prior to 9pm, had figure more similar to those used by Victoria’s Secret .  The woman in the lingerie did not even have anything to do with the product being sold.

“House”, “Bones”, and “Lie to Me” all air in the 8pm hour and all are rated TV-14.  This must mean that they are only appropriate to families where the children are all over the age of 14.   These shows all  have dealt with sexual and/or violent content and yet air during time Fox designates as family time.  The episode of “House” for Monday, April 26th deals with the subject of open marriage.  Fox must by their own statement find this to be appropriate subject matter for the family hour.

The episode of “The Cleveland Show” which aired on Sunday night at 8:30pm, following a new episode of “The Simpsons” further contradicted Fox’s claim of the family hour.  The Cleveland Show is a spin off of  “Family Guy”.  This Sunday’s episode titled “Buried Pleasure” was a re-airing of an episode from February of this year. The episode centered around a minor character and his sex doll.  The sex doll is shown several times during the episode and is scantily dressed with its mouth in a permanent o shape.  He is fixed up with a female character who then proceeds to beat him and several other male characters.  At this point Cleveland’s wife says, “I never hit a girl, either.  But I will smack the white off a bitch!”  The two female characters then fight for an extended sequence which includes the wife grabbing the other woman by the breasts and the swinging her.  The show ends with the minor character walking off after being reunited with his sex doll.  This is in no way acceptable as family viewing, and Fox would be unable to say otherwise.

The content Fox allows in prime time both in programming and commercials contradict their own statements and further illustrate the double standard being placed against the Lane Bryant ad.  Fox needs to be honest with themselves and with the public.

YouTube Video – Lane Bryant Ad Under Fire

The case of the seven year old boy from Russia adopted by a 33 year old single mother from Tennessee and returned to Russia by her when his behaviors and psychological issues became too much for her and her family to deal with has hit a personal chord with me.  I spent 5 years of my life working with children and teens that for one reason or another ended up in the care of the system.  Some of these were kids from failed adoptions, and in at least one case the teen was from Russia.  The work was hard, dealing often with disrespect and outright violence directed toward staff.  The work could also be rewarding, seeing kids make changes and improvements in their lives because of the support of staff.  The problems and rewards were a lot like those of parenthood.

Adoptions do not come with any guarantees, just like parenthood itself.  Adopting an older child is always a risk, and adopting an older child from a foreign country and culture just adds to that risk. The teen from Russia that I worked with in the group home had come over here at a young age but still had memories of her prostitute mother and of things no child should ever have to remember.  Who knows what experiences this boy had before he came here?  The Adoptive mother’s allegations that she was deceived by the adoption facility in Russia as justification for her actions seems to be a case of passing the blame for not being fully prepared for what she was getting herself and her family into.

The boy was only here for six months and in that time the adoptive mother never had him talk to a psychologist, let alone attempted any form of counseling.   Without any professional input she is still quoted as using terms such as mentally unstable and psychopathic issues.  I realize she is a nurse, but I doubt her credibility to diagnose such issues.   Had she tried some form of counseling and that failed I could see her becoming frustrated and maybe looking to institutionalization as an option, even short term.  The teen I worked with had been placed in the system by her original adoptive family with the initial hope of reunification, but after time that was not seen as a viable solution.  At least they tried something before giving up.  The adoptive family of the Russian boy has said they thought love for this child would be enough, but  sometimes love is not all you need.  Sometimes you need professional support and intervention,

This story has an unhappy ending.  The adoptive mother may or may not face criminal charges and the boy is back where he was six months ago, likely more confused and hurt than he was before.  My case at work had a happier ending.  She was placed with another family who was adequately aware and prepared to deal with her problems and concerns.

Russian authorities are upset over this situation, and understandably so.  This is one in a string of problems with American adoptions, but putting an end to U.S. adoptions is not the solution.  The solution comes from reforming the policies allowing for better education and screening of prospective parents prior to adoption so they are fully aware of the risks involved and improving access to existing resources such as community based counseling and support groups for families who adopt internationally.

Parenthood is not easy and there is no six month guaranteed return policy.

© 2012 Jousting Windmills Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer