Image 01

Posts Tagged ‘Homeland Security’

Legacy of Osama bin Laden

Thursday, May 5th, 2011

I know on first glance the title of this may very well upset many people, because it theoretically could imply that Osama bin Laden deserves any degree of respect. That is not my intention. There are negative legacies, and this is decidedly one. This legacy is one of fear, intolerance, stupidity, political posturing, and a myriad of other negative actions and attitudes that have become a part of the American way of life since September 11th.

Osama bin Laden

Osama bin Laden - Seth Anderson (CC)

While this is arguably the biggest news since the 2001 attacks, I have been intentionally avoiding writing a single word on it. This is nothing new for me, since I tend to wait and see what the lay of the land is after at least a little of the dust has settled. In the days following the official announcement from the White House, there have been pundits running about offering their opinions on everything from bin Laden’s impact on American culture to whether or not how the Navy disposed of the body was religiously appropriate. Monday morning quarterbacking of the mission itself has moved beyond the sublime to the absurd, when one considers the faux-debate over the use of the name Geronimo in the raid. (To be fair, there are far more substantial issues for the Tribal Nations collectively to bring to the table, and admittedly, this offers them an excellent opportunity to do so. I hope they take it. *Thank you to Tony Brown for pushing me to think about this issue more.)

If one was looking for any signs of mourning in the Muslim world, we were told not to expect it – bin Laden’s death was apparently a happy moment for them, if for different reasons from the ones that caused jubilation at Ground Zero and Washington, D.C. We were even given a naïve explanation from the generation that probably can’t remember what life was like before bin Laden about why they took to the streets to celebrate his death. Why they think that they somehow “own” this part of history is questionable, but they are still young and have much to learn.

The White House gave us an iconic photograph of the Situation Room during the raid, and Secretary Clinton attempted to explain its context. As I write these words, the President is laying a wreath at Ground Zero, and (appropriately?) decided not to speak on that hallowed ground today. While Secretary Clinton states that the U.S. will continue to stand by Pakistan, the Pakistani military is stating that they want the ouster of the majority of the U.S. Military from their soil. We even saw a professional football player trip over words about bin Laden’s death on Twitter, and later try to clarify his position.

But the dust is still flying, and isn’t showing any signs of settling. It’s been said – not often enough – that the way we have lived for the past decade isn’t really a testament to our resiliency or strength. We have falsely contented ourselves with the fact that we haven’t seen repeated attacks on U.S. soil (although we have seen a few foiled), claiming that there is real value in the fact that we’ve also surrendered many freedoms to that end. We are still living in the shadow of bin Laden, and will continue to do so until we decide that our freedom is more important than creating the illusion that we are safe. We will never return to life as it was before September 11th, and rightfully so. We were foolishly arrogant in our thinking, assuming that we were impervious to terrorist attacks. However, if we continue to live as we have, perpetually in fear of another attack, bin Laden has won even though he is dead. It is up to us. There must be a middle-ground between what life in America was on September 10th, and what it is now. Is it time to reassess our way of life, or do we continue with the status quo and become bin Laden’s legacy of fear?

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Flying the not-so-friendly skies

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

My mother was listening to talk radio today, and told me about a blind man that had his cane confiscated by the airline, presumably because it could be used as a weapon. She may have missed some of the story, and had actually been hearing about a blind man that was turned away from a Dubai airline for not having an escort. Troubles for the blind are common in the world of travel and business, and it is not hard to find examples.

Beyond problems for the blind, there are issues for individuals with other handicaps, as my mother heard from a caller to KDKA Radio’s Marty Griffin show. She told me about a caller that explained his difficulties getting onto a plane, due to the hooks he had in place of hands he had lost during the Vietnam War. My mother told me that she could tell the man was probably in tears as he described his problems with air travel, and said that he stated that he never attempted to fly again.

It infuriated me to hear this, particularly since this man is a disabled veteran. But, beyond the issue of handicapped persons having problems with airlines, there is a much more important issue. We are still ruled by fear. Airlines and the government continue to push insane security procedures in the attempt to keep us safe from terrorism, when the reality of the situation is that if terrorists truly wanted to harm us, they would find a way regardless what we do. Travelers in general are inconvenienced daily to create this false sense of security.

Yes, there are certain security measures that honestly do need to be in place, but the harassment of the handicapped, and honestly insane situations like the stories of forcing women to drink their own breast milk before boarding a plane are just that – insane. The bottom line is that we can’t stop every terrorist from carrying out attacks. It is impossible. When they read stories about blind men being turned away from flights, or having their canes confiscated, war veterans being harassed over prosthetics, or women drinking breast milk in order to fly, they know they have won. While not as satisfying to their blood lust as mass murder, it is still a victory for them. All of these things are signs that they are in control of our lives. I am not suggesting that we stop screening luggage and passengers – I am saying that we need to re-examine the laundry list of rules and procedures we have adopted over the past nine years to keep us safe. We need to be sensible, not irrational. We need to stop letting them win by living in fear of what they might do. Fear paralyzes people, and it is time that we stopped letting our enemies (and our government) control us with it.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Media Covering Kid Air Traffic Controllers Too Much

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Normally, when it comes to air travel security issues, I would be all for the media literally saturating the air waves. When I say that, I mean the “issues” that involve something that travelers really need to know or do in order to make it to their destinations with few problems – i.e., the reports in the past about limitations on what people could carry in their luggage.

Then there are the security issues that the public really doesn’t need to know, and usually they don’t. We don’t need to know whether or not air security personnel are on the look out for particular people – or types of people. We don’t need to know about every homeland security alert, and we usually don’t. Finally, we don’t need to know about security concerns in air traffic control when there wasn’t an incident as a result of it.

What is the common thread in all those issues that we don’t need to know about? It’s fairly simple. They are all situations that we don’t want our enemies to know.

Call me paranoid if you like, but when I saw the reports about the kids in the control towers parroting their dad’s transmissions to pilots, I kept thinking “Oh great! Now every wacko with even a slight idea in their heads about messing with JFK is thinking about it more seriously!” And that thought was quickly followed with another – “And now everyone from every other country in the world can justify their contentions that we’re stupid!”

Yes, it was a mistake. Yes, action should be taken, and apparently is. That should be the end of it. There is no earthly reason why this story should still be in circulation on the news networks – and no, I don’t consider the “new” development that the idiot air traffic controller in question did it more than once with two of his kids worthy of reporting. The “story” never should have been out there in the first place, and is a classic example of the media’s failure to properly determine whether or not something “should” be reported.

So, for future reference, please don’t report stories that tempt terrorists to attack because they think there might be new gaping holes in our security, and make our country look like a bunch of mouth-breathing idiots to the entire world.  There’s plenty of stories out there that make us look like idiots, but don’t also tempt terrorists. Stick with them!

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009-2010 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer