Image 01

Posts Tagged ‘Chicago’

Bending the election rules in Chicago soon?

Monday, January 24th, 2011

Of course there’s quite a bit of hype about the court ruling today removing Rahm Emanuel from the Chicago mayoral ballot. Supporters are crying foul, while detractors are either rejoicing or bemoaning the potential consequences – none good. On the one hand, there’s a possibility that Emanuel will be replaced with someone more objectionable, and on the other, there’s the possibility that he will succeed in getting placed on the ballot through an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.

carousel

If the latter, Illinois may as well throw out their standing election procedures. The current residency requirement appears fairly straightforward – one year residency in the given municipality prior to running for office. Sorry folks, but living in Washington, D.C. while renting one’s Chicago home to another party does not add up to “legally residing” in Chicago. For those that are curious, the opinion of the Illinois Appellate Court is here.

But hey, maybe I don’t know anything about these things. Okay, maybe I do, or at least maybe these folks figure I do, since I’m listed as an instructor on running for public office there this spring.

Update: The Illinois Supreme Court has spoken, sort of. They ordered that Emanuel’s name remain on the ballot, pending their decision. If they don’t choose to hear the case, his name is off again. Also, predictable if nothing else, Emanuel’s good friend Obama stated his disagreement with the ruling of the Appellate Court. Feel free to discuss amongst yourselves whether or not a sitting President has any business whatsoever making comments on rulings of states’ court rulings…

Update Part Deux: Seriously considering renaming this one “Breaking the election rules in Chicago.” I would like to say that I’m surprised at the ruling of the Illinois Supreme Court, but in all honesty, it was utterly predictable. It would be nice if “residency” had the same meaning for politicians as it does for city employees. At least then there wouldn’t have been a debate in the first place. Given that Emanuel’s campaign war chest has been supported substantially by people outside Chicago, one must wonder what he will do if he wins the election. The rules of the game typically include repaying investment in a campaign with “favors” of one kind or another, and Emanuel will theoretically have to “help” quite a few from outside Chicago. Well, maybe the people from Chicago will think twice before voting for him if they seriously consider that. Ok, maybe not.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Dissing Chicago or why some conservatives are unpatriotic

Monday, October 5th, 2009

Sure, it seems a natural reaction to wish ill of the winner in a political race when you’re on the losing side – except when it is for the presidency.

Rule one has always been that no matter how much you dislike or disagree with a sitting president, when it comes to situations on the world stage, you shut your mouth. Complain all you like within our borders, but don’t give other countries the satisfaction of seeing you act like a buffoon, particularly on something like the Olympics.

I know there will be those who will call this “apples and oranges”, but back during the previous presidency, there was a group called the Dixie Chicks. They were ruined professionally by conservatives for committing the awful sin of saying that Bush was wrong to get into a war in Iraq. Ironically enough, some of those same people might actually agree with them now, but back then, “complaints” went to the level of death threats.

So dissing the Dixie Chicks is patriotic, and so is dissing Chicago, right? Wrong!

Coming out publicly saying that it’s a good thing that Chicago didn’t get to host the Olympics because Obama went to campaign for it is unpatriotic, period. It makes all of this country look like a bunch of uncultured, uneducated, mouth-breathing idiots instead of just the ones saying it.

These people have already been called adolescents, but that was too kind. You can’t wrap yourself in the flag after behavior like this – no one buys a false patriot.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009-2010 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer