Image 01

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Republicans in the Bedroom

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Have you ever noticed that too many Republican candidates are sticking their noses into American bedrooms? Now normally I lean to the Republican side of the fence but they are pissing me off on two issues. These two issues are always hot topics come election time so I decided to get them out of the way now. Once again, as always elected officials in the federal government are busy fighting over issues that should be handed off to the states to decide. The Republicans are so focused on what the American people are doing, its almost as if every household in America is having an orgy. Imagine that, elected officials bending the American people over, who would have thought? These elected federal officials will waste our time and money arguing over abortion and gay marriage aka civil unions. Really? How about we focus on jobs, the national debt, healthcare, and the other important things we need to worry about. How about we find away for America to stand on her own two feet again and stop leaning on China.

Attribution by pdstahl (CC)

First, lets talk about the abortion issue. If many Republicans had their choice all abortions would be illegal no matter what the reason for it. While I personally would never want my wife to have an abortion unless it was needed to save her life or if she was raped. Now, if she was raped I can positively say that when I would find the SOB that did it and I would be the judge, jury and executioner. He would be found guilty, sentenced to death, and the execution would happen within minutes of the sentencing. I can promise that it will be a very slow and painful death with no chance of a stay in execution. I’m sure the liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and other whack jobs will be all over me for that but hey oh well. Anyways, abortion is an issue that the states need to decide. While I would never want my wife to have one, it is nobody’s business if we do. Just like if you and your spouse and or significant other decide to have an abortion what business is it of mine? It’s not and I would expect you to tell me to butt the hell out of your business much like I would tell you if you got into mine. The federal government allows each state to decide many of their own gun laws, but the gun in a man’s pants along with the target in a woman’s pants have to be protected by condoms called the federal government. I can honestly say that is one prophylactic I wouldn’t trust. How about we change, “Uncle Sam Wants You” to “Uncle Sam Wants In Your Pants.” Its kind of catchy or it could be mistaken for a bad porn movie. How about the federal government worry about their jobs while the State officials worry about their. Then again, the federally elected officials will also be the ones collecting their pay checks when they deny social security checks to America’s senior citizens, another way the federal government is bending the American people over. The federal government needs to realize there are state governments for a reason. In fact, in my opinion the state elected officials are more in tune with the wants and needs of their constituents then any elected official to the federal government. Before we wrap up the abortion issue I need to get one more thing of my chest. To all of those that have two or more Pro-Life bumper stickers on your car. We get your point! One bumper sticker tells us your opinion on the matter, you don’t need more than one. Also, you may call it murder but have you ever even seen a murder? If not I will gladly invite you to any inner city and I will drop you off there. Be warned, when I tell you to get out I am not stopping at the stop sign. I will slow down to a safe departure speed for you to exit the truck. Once your out you are own you own and I’m not looking back. Next time I see you will be on the 6:00 PM news.

On to my second complaint about Republicans in the bedroom. Let’s talk about the whole gay marriage thing or as some states are calling it civil unions. First, in my opinion there is no such thing as a gay marriage. To me a marriage is a union between a man and a woman. That’s it, no changing a word to make it politically correct after 100′s of years. This reminds me of an old saying my uncle use to use when is was growing up, “The funny thing about that little white speck on the top of chicken shit. That little white speck is chicken shit too”. Yes I know, that same line was in the movie Pure Country but I remember as a little kid hearing my uncle say it and not understanding until I got older. If you want to call them civil unions that’s fine and for this article I will call them just that. While I am personally against civil unions its not my choice. It should not be the choice of the federal government either, it should be the decision of each individual state. Once again, the decision should be made by the elected state officials based on what the citizens of that state want. If the citizens of Pennsylvania don’t want civil unions then our elected officials should vote against it. If the residents of California want to have civil unions, well then their elected officials need to act in a manner that speaks for the people, not their personal opinion. This is just another case of Uncle Sam trying to butt into each states business. Kind of like the big brother syndrome. If big brother doesn’t like it then you better not do it but if big brother wants it well you better hop to it before he gets mad. This all comes at a time when many Republicans are looking to defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act. Remember, this was even sign into law by a Democrat President. Yes, President Wild Willy Billy Clinton signed this law. Just an added note for humor, President Clinton signed this law about a year and a half before the media broke the story of Wild Bill, Monica, and the stained blue dress.

I think many people will agree that these issues are state issues. Each state should have the right to make laws for the people by the people right? It is obvious that big brother doesn’t like it’s little brothers are making their own decisions. For those of you that have an interest in American history, let us think back to our history classes. In 1860 when President Lincoln was elected many southerners believed that the government was growing to strong. The southern states and its citizens felt that the federal government had no right to tell them how they lived. The people of the south believed that if they remained part of the United States the North would control them. Therefore many states in the south decided to leave the United States. Big Brother didn’t like this and when they were told to leave Confederate land and refused an eviction noticed was served. Thus leading to the Union aka the North aka the Inited States to wage war on the newly formed Confederate States of America. While this is still a debate today as to whether states can or can not secede, we will leave that for another article. It all comes back to states rights. It doesn’t matter what the issue in debate is, the federal government continues to over step its boundaries by not allowing the states to govern themselves. The United States is made up of individual states, therefore the states must be able to govern themselves in a manner that represents the wishes of the people. The federal government needs to worry about the issues facing the nation as a whole. With this said, I feel the only proper way to end this article is with these two words, “Deo Vindice”!

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Who Should the United States Pay?

Saturday, July 16th, 2011

On Tuesday, President Obama said he cannot guarantee that retirees will receive their Social Security checks on August 3rd. Why is it that the retirees of our country may not get their money? I bet the President, his staff, and other government employees will. Well, President Obama is blaming it on the budget. Now, while Democrats and Republicans need to come to a solution in regards to the budget, in my opinion it goes beyond that. In fact, Republican Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky went as far as saying that he does not see a way for Republicans and Democrats to come to an agreement on meaningful deficit reduction as long as Mr. Obama remains in office. It is obvious that our President doesn’t have the peoples best interest in mind when he is making decisions. Mr. Obama has been forcing the idea of raising the debt ceiling. He has even gone as far as trying to find a way to do this without the approval of Congress. What does that tell you? We elect our officials in Washington D.C. To represent we the people. The Senators and Representatives in our nations capitol are suppose to be the voice of the people and they are suppose to do what they feel is best for America. Therefore, they have said no to the President and his proposal to increase the debt ceiling. Meanwhile, President Obama is trying to undermine the whole system to get his way. What did he discover, he can’t. So if he can’t undermine it he may as well try blackmailing it. Maybe that will work.

How is he going to blackmail Congress to get his way? It’s a simple game he is going to try and play. Remember when we were young and dumb? There was a game many of us played while the rules were simple and the same game could be played different ways but the theory behind it was the same. That game is called chicken. I have seen the game played many ways and again I repeat we was young and dumb and I no longer recommend anyone plays this game, especially like we did. We would challenge something or someone, whether it was another person, a car, or the really really dumb idea a train. You would run at each other or stand in the path of the moving vehicle and whoever moved out of the way first was the loser. See simple, but dumb. President Obama is currently playing this game with the Republicans and the American people are in the way. Know you maybe asking how is our President doing this. He is using the scare tactic. Republicans won’t give him what he wants so he tries to make them look like the evil people that the Democrats make them out to be. President Obama says to the senior citizens of our country, look the Republicans won’t agree with me, they are bad and evil, if you don’t get your social security checks its because of them. Now these are not his exact words but I see what he is thinking. Why is he trying to scare the senior citizens of our country, why is he throwing the American people that is is sworn to protect under the train? Simple, the largest age group for voters is those ages 45 years old and up. Voters that are age 55 and up make up the largest part of this group. These are the people that are currently collecting their social security or will be collecting it in the near future. If he can scare them enough when it comes time to vote, how do you think they will vote? Of course, they are not going to vote for the evil Republicans, it is because of them that they might not get their social security checks. Meanwhile, the Republicans are forced to play the game that President Obama has forced them into. It’s a difficult game the Republicans are forced to play, they can either give into Dictator Obama’s ways and drive America into the dirt faster or take the chance and possibly face an angry nation on election day. My hope and I am sure the Republicans have the same hope is that the American people are not as dumb as the President thinks we are. Then again, there are way too many uninformed voters out there that base their voting on what they heard on the 6:00 news.

Now since money seems to be the issue here lets take a look at the money. With no money to pay the social security checks that are to go out in August, President Obama has made sure that the United Nations, Egypt, Pakistan, and other countries around the world get their share of the United States money or in the case of Egypt, we will just forget the money they owe and we will give them more. So the United States borrows money from China only to give it to other countries. Only for the United States to have to pay China back for the money we gave away. Makes sense huh? Each year the United States gives billions of dollars to other countries for such things as peacekeeping, development assistance, AIDS, broadcasting, military training, fight the drug war, and my favorite; to leave other countries alone. Don’t think this is all of them, there are many many more. Please see the link below for a more detailed list. I don’t understand why the United States is putting other countries first when we can barely take care of our own. Well, I understand that we are to busy kissing ass to worry about our own. Meanwhile back on the farm, the uninformed voters are having the crap scared out of them by a dictator that have made our country worse then it was before. The uniformed voters have put this man in office, our nation’s future is in the hands of a man that is clueless to what is best for the American people. He doesn’t care that Americans are hurting, he doesn’t care that behind our backs other countries are laughing at us while we are handing them money hand over fist. I honestly believe that Barrack Hussein Obama is trying to kill America. He has not done one thing to benefit this country since taking office.

The Republicans are not giving into what our leader wants because they and their constituents feel this is not the best thing for America. What did I say? Yes, someone in Washington D.C. is doing their job. While Obama scares people into believing that they may not get their social security checks I can honestly say that I am sure he will get his pay check. Is that fair? Of course not but why should he care about the people. Now while we know the Republicans are watching out for America there are some people that believe that a budget agreement can’t be reached for other reasons. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) believes that the reason there can not be an agreement on the budget is because President Obama is black. Yes that’s right, our country is crashing down because he is black. Now here is the surprising part, Rep. Jackson Lee is black. I know, no great surprise there. She also asked why the President is being treated so disrespectful? Why, well that’s a simple answer, cause he is a moron, that is why. Barrack Hussein Obama is and has been nothing more than a wolf in sheep clothing. President Obama preached change in his run for office and that one word fooled enough people into voting for him. We got our change; the deficit has changed for the worse, unemployment has gotten worse, respect for America has gotten worse, and the the attitude of many Americans has gotten worse. Is this the change those of you that voted for him wanted? I hope not. However, this doesn’t surprise me if you take a look at some of Obama’s friends and supporters. For instance, George Soros; found guilty by a French Court for insider trading, gives millions of dollars to keep people on the welfare system instead of trying to help get them off the system, spends millions of dollars to legalize drugs, and spends millions of dollars on gun control. Well, looking at this in my opinion he wants to keep Americans in a position to rely on the government for their survival. Then there is my favorite; Bill Ayers, a predominate member of the Weatherman Underground Organization. While the Obama Administration will admit no connection between the two, there is proof elsewhere. Who is the Weather Underground you ask? During the 1960′s & 1970′s they were a radical left wing organization that bombed a Chicago Police Station, the Pentagon, and the Capitol. Trying to bring down our nation. Meanwhile, 40 years later, President Obama is using words to terrorize the American people where his good friend Bill Ayers used bombs. Which one is more dangerous? I believe the terrorism by words is. While the bombs may bring down buildings one at a time a man speaking the right words can bring down a nation at one time. President Obama’s words of rhetoric are scaring our nation’s people. The words are scaring the people that worked their whole lives to build America into what she was before President Obama and his friends began to their work to destroy her and what she stands for.

All I can tell you my fellow Americans, don’t believe in the words of a man that wants to destroy America, a man that supports America’s enemies, and a man that sees himself as the one that can save America by rewriting the Constitution of this country into his own idea of what America or even the world should be like. A man the believes it is more important to take care of other countries before he takes care of the one that he was sworn to protect. My fellow American’s don’t vote based of what this man says, vote based off of what you know. The enemy of Obama and those like him are the informed voters not the uninformed. Don’t just listen to what one side of the isle has to say listen to both and then and only then make your decision.

Vaugns U.S. Forgeign Aid

George Soros

The Ayres/Obama Connection

Weatherman Underground Organization

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas)

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Who is Elena Kagan?

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

The press has had a while to dig for information on who Elena Kagan really is, so the obvious observation for the moment is that practically every “new” piece isn’t really so new. Sure, it sounds sexy to claim that one has dug up “dirt” from her past (like Steven Ertelt did at LifeNews.com), but the fact is that it’s not hard to find any of this information. Kagan’s alma mater has made it exceptionally easy to look at her past writings at “The Daily Princetonian”, and the piece that Ertelt referred to is open for public view.

No matter how much Ertelt might want to wish it so, there is no way to interpret what Kagan wrote – assuming one takes it in context as opposed to selectively quoting as Ertelt did – as a statement purely against the “pro-life” movement. Yes, she did the same thing I just did, placing a part of her statement in quotes, implying nothing more than I have – hypocrisy. You can’t have it both ways. Either you are truly pro-life, or you’re sort of pro-life and open to attack for being a hypocrite. Kagan was pointing out the hypocrisy of being against abortion, but for bombs – remembering this was still during the Cold War, and we were competing with the Soviets to maintain nuclear superiority. Times change, situations differ slightly, but the end result is the same. You can’t be for saving the unborn, and capital punishment and gun rights. Sorry, but that reeks of hypocrisy. And that’s not even getting into the hypocrisy of the failure to consider the real consequences of forcing women to have babies they don’t want. But that typically falls on deaf ears anyway, since quality of life is a foreign concept to most from the “pro-life” camp. And please don’t insult yourselves by suggesting that everyone only have sex when they actually want to pro-create. It is too tempting to bring up Monty Python’s “Every Sperm is Sacred” skit then.

Kagan hasn’t just drawn fire from the religious right. She’s also annoyed the military. But one needs to tread lightly when approaching this situation (pun partially intended.) First of all, not everyone in the military – including high-ranking officers – are for the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Secondly, Kagan’s decision to ban military recruiters from Harvard’s law school was driven by campus politics – something she freely admitted at the time, and still does (as far as I know.) In other words, her actions undoubtedly had more to do with serving her “constituency”, the students and staff of her institution, than any personal ideology. True, she came out publicly stating that the policy was counter to the precepts of freedom in general, and the argument could be made that she should have avoided saying that outright. But, we’re sitting on the precipice of seeing the demise of that policy anyway, with the support of, that’s right, the military. That said, we could just as easily turn back the clock to the Civil War, and say that she came out against slavery years earlier. Slavery was permitted by law, remember? Doesn’t make it right.

And that brings us to the RNC’s fears of legislating from the bench. This was born of Kagan’s assertion that the Constitution as originally drafted was defective. Now, the RNC can’t count on it’s own members on the Hill to carry on this argument, and for good reason. Beyond slavery, there was also the absence of a woman’s right to vote in the original document. The beauty of the Constitution is in the fact that it was originally drafted to be fluid. The men that drafted it weren’t so arrogant to think that their words would be law ad infinitum, and they left us with the ability to change it. As for arguments against legislating from the bench, historically, that has typically happened when the legislative branch has failed in one way or another to move with the times. It is an unforeseen result of the fluidity of the structure of the Constitution – if nothing else, it is a testament of its genius, not a statement against the Courts.

Finally, the most troublesome of the objections I have seen so far, Kagan helped to defend Saudis against 9/11 lawsuits. While this can easily be considered morally reprehensible, it is the direct result of long-standing agreements and treaties between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. I sincerely doubt she relished that particular duty.

As a conservative, I’m not in love with Kagan as a candidate for SCOTUS. Then again, I wouldn’t be overly pleased with any candidate Obama would offer. But, I can say that the majority of the objections beyond her lack of judicial experience are hyperbole. Her lack of judicial experience is the direct result of the GOP, since she failed to garner the votes necessary for confirmation during the Clinton administration. Apparently even then she was considered a possibility for filling a vacancy on the highest court, so maybe the hope was then that if she wasn’t on a bench somewhere, she wouldn’t be considered later. If that was the case, we’ll find out soon enough if the tactic worked.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009-2010 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer