Image 01

Archive for the ‘Life’ Category

National Organization for Marriage Leader Says Yes To Equality

Sunday, April 10th, 2011

Louis J. Marinelli once loudly and vehemently opposed gays and lesbians from having the right to marry. He opposed it so strongly that he, according to his own blog, organized the 2010 Summer for Marriage Tour for the National Organization for Marriage. He organized rallies and started Facebook groups. Then something happened, Marinelli had a change of heart.

Wedding Ring - Eivind Barstad Waaler (CC)

Wedding Ring - Eivind Barstad Waaler (CC)

He realized over time that he supported civil marriage equality. He realized that gays and lesbians were not out to destroy American culture, they were just real people who wanted the same rights to participate in it as the rest of us. I commend him for having the courage to stand up to those he once supported, and to apologize to those he once attacked. I also commend him for commenting on the difference between civil marriage and holy matrimony.

He summed it up clearly and eloquently by saying “Once you understand the great difference between civil marriage and holy marriage, there is not one valid reason to forbid the former from same-sex couples, and all that is left to protect is the latter.”

Some may challenge Marinelli’s right to continue to call himself a conservative, but I consider myself a conservative and I agree with him. Being conservative is not a matter of religion, and those that see that it is have hijacked the term for their own use. Being conservative is also not a matter of discrimination, bigotry, or denying individuals their right to equality under law.

Arguments against civil marriage equality are impossible to make without religion entering the argument. If religion is the only basis for the argument, then a little thing called the First Amendment comes into play. Our government has no right to deny civil equality of any kind based only on religious arguments. People are guarantee the freedom of religion, but they are also guaranteed freedom from religion.

Marinelli had a change of heart, but it will take a lot more hearts to change before there is any chance of national civil marriage equality, especially if you take into account recent polls in Mississippi about GOP voters’ views on interracial marriage, marriage equality still has a long way to go.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Congrats to The Urban Politico

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

Congratulations to our new friends at The Urban Politico for winning the Best Political Blog award in the 2010 Black Weblog Awards! We may not always agree, but there’s no denying the great work you’re doing!

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Shirley Sherrod chooses litigation over full-time employment

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Shirley Sherrod rejected an offer from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to return to the department as a full-time employee. This decision was made amidst rumors (started by Sherrod herself) that there is a lawsuit on the horizon against Andrew Breitbart. While not taking the full-time position offered, she willingly took a part-time consulting position, apparently to assist the department in their future civil rights issues.

For the benefit of anyone that has been living under a rock for past couple months, Sherrod came to the attention of the public for some allegedly racially insensitive statements she had made that were taken out of context by Breitbart. Officials in the Obama Administration forcefully requested her resignation when they became aware of what Breitbart was planning on posting about Sherrod. Mainstream media cried foul against FoxNews for running with the story, in spite of the fact that after initially being on Breitbart’s side (sticking with just the edited version), the network ended up on Sherrod’s side, implying that the administration was wrong for forcing her resignation. While Breitbart was irresponsible in his actions, Sherrod suffered professional and financial damages as a result of her forced resignation – theoretically that should have left Breitbart as at best a co-defendant with the Obama Administration in any lawsuit, but apparently he’s the only one with litigation in his future. As for why Sherrod won’t take on a full-time position with the Department of Agriculture, her story is that she needs a break, and has aspirations to work on civil rights issues elsewhere. Other than pointing out that one needs a scorecard to keep track of this story, all I can say is “no comment!”

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009-2010 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer