Image 01

Author Archive

CSI Running Dry?

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

CSI was once a television ratings powerhouse, with 2 spin offs to prove its rating muscle, but times have changed it seems. Lawrence Fishburne  is departing after 2 seasons, and his replacement has been announced. Ted Danson has been named as the new head of the CSI night shift. Yeah that Ted Danson. Sam Malone of Cheers  and John Becker of, well, Becker is now heading up CSI. Before you scoff and dismiss him as a sitcom star, consider he did get 3 Emmy Nominations for his role on the FX dramatic series Damages.

Ted Danson

Ted Danson and Mary Steenburgen - Kristin Dos Santos (CC)


Ratings have dropped, not only for CSI, but CSI: Miami and CSI: New York. Meanwhile similar shows on CBS are still going strong. NCIS, Criminal Minds, and NCIS: LA all beat any and all of the CSI franchises in the ratings last year. Maybe choosing Danson is a last ditch effort to re-invent or at least re-invigorate a failing franchise. It may already be a case of too little too late.

CBS has already moved CSI to Wednesdays at 10pm following the stronger performing Criminal Minds, and given its’ cushy 9pm Thursday night time slot to new comer Person of Interest. Produced by J J Abrams and starring Michael Emerson, of LOST, and Jim Caviezel, of  Passion of the Christ, Person of Interest has according to CBS tested better than any new drama in 15 years. One CBS executive said it had “crazy broad appeal you don’t usually see.” A rookie show beats you out of your time slot of  over 10 years? Never a good sign, no matter what the test groups say.

CSI re-invented the crime investigation genre, and shows like NCIS and Criminal Minds owe their success in part to the doors CSI cast wide open, but maybe the time has come for the old  to step out of the way, because the new are definitely doing something better.  If Danson can not turn the show around, more viewers will turn it off and we may well see the end of CSI legacy.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Endeavour Boldly Going One Last Time

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

The Space Shuttle Endeavour boldly went today where, frankly, a lot of men and women have gone before. Into orbit around the Earth and re-supply the International Space Station. I am not trying to trivialize their mission, but it has become routine. The Space Shuttle Program has proved its point and its time has come.

Endeavour Crew Poster - NASA

Endeavour Crew Poster - NASA


I give the Endeavour crew credit. They chose J. J. Abrams reboot of Star Trek to model their mission poster after. Star Trek and NASA have been connected for quite a while. The first Space Shuttle was named Enterprise for a reason. Astronauts tend to be fans of the shows, and the actors from the franchise tend to support space exploration.

NASA has been the only game in space in the US, but like original Trek gave way to The Next Generation, the old guard needs to give way to the future. The government needs to share the way with private enterprise exploration of the final frontier.

I personally argued against trusting private enterprise with space exploration, but then my inner Trekker kicked in and I realized that even in Trek the biggest leap forward came from a man seeking to make money from his findings. The film was Star Trek: First Contact and the man was Zefram Cochrane, father of Warp drive according to long standing Trek lore. He did not design his Warp drive for altruistic reasons. He designed it because he felt there was potential profit in it. Profit potential is a great motivator, and maybe it will motivate our journey into the final frontier.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Hillary Clinton Too Sexy?

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

Hillary Clinton has now been edited out by 2 Hasidic news outlets. One claimed because she could be “sexually suggestive” and the other due to “laws of modesty”. So is this the birth of Hillary the sex symbol? Not likely.

Hillary

Hillary - DonkeyHotey(CC)


There is already a sex symbol in the Clinton marriage and she ain’t it. Bill Clinton was elected in large part because of his charisma, and as the multitude of dalliances we know all about means he had that way with more than his share of ladies.  Ladies love him, men want to be him. That is the definition of a male sex symbol.

Hillary on the other hand has  almost no sex appeal at all. “Almost no” may be even giving her the benefit of the doubt. Did it hurt her in the last election? Well she may be in the Situation Room, but she is not in the Oval Office. Enough said on that.

As a fellow blogger has told me over and over again, politics is all about sex. Like it or not she is right. We make decisions both consciously and unconsciously all the time based on sexual criteria.

I understand religious practices, modesty, and the like but I do not condone the photo-shopping of history. I just have a hard time believing anyone could find Hillary sexually suggestive. I am not sure even her husband does. She may be many things, but sex symbol she is not. Do not use the photo if you are afraid Hasidic boys could be hiding Hillary pics under their mattress. They would be the only ones, ever I would guess.

TwitterTechnorati FavoritesStumbleUponFacebookDeliciousDiggShare

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009-2010 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.

Featuring WPMU Bloglist Widget by YD WordPress Developer